Subject: Read ONLY, IF AND WHEN you have time and mood for:
“An Ayah for 30 Days” — September 2012
PRELUDE
From the Pen and Perspective of a self-styled PPK Muslim (Proud, Practicing, Knowledgeable) with a humble submission that Islam totally rejects Blind Following BUT vigorously focusses on the Limitations of Pure Human Reasoning…………..and clearly and comprehensively ALLAH knows best.
In the beginning of the seventh century C.E., the folks of Mecca and Medina had a fascinatingly unique window: they had direct access to the Heavens through one of their own. They were blessed with a regular stream of Divine counseling and guidelines. Question and answer sessions were part of the program. Even individual questioner was graced by an answer. In the short Introduction to this scheme they were assured that at the end of this twenty-two year project, Divine Directions and Admonitions will continue through the agency of the PEN. The whole discourse has been preserved and archived till eternity under the guarantee of our Lord and Creator. This record in known as the Quran.
It should sound unbelievable but factually appears to be true: Many of our prevalent, widespreadand important concepts and opinions about religious matters do not have a basis in the Quran and sometimes even appear to be in obvious conflict with the teachings of the Quran. It would bevery educative and helpful to discuss an Ayah once a month to see if it supports or rejects ourviews and actions in our daily life. I wish and hope this generates a fruitful interactive discussion.
AYAH
Continued from Previous
Surah 33 Ayah 53:
“O ye who believe! Enter not the Prophet’s houses,-until leave is given you,- for a meal, (and then) not (so early as) to wait for its preparation: but when ye are invited, enter; and when ye have taken your meal, disperse, without seeking familiar talk. Such (behaviour) annoys the Prophet: he is ashamed to dismiss you, but Allah is not ashamed (to tell you) the truth. And when ye ask (his ladies) for anything ye want, ask them from before a screen: that makes for greater purity for your hearts and for theirs. Nor is it right for you that ye should annoy Allah’s Messenger, or that ye should marry his widows after him at any time. Truly such a thing is in Allah’s sight an enormity.” Yusuf Ali
a) This is the ayah referred to as “the ayah of the veil”, or as the “descent of Hijab” and it heralded the drawing of curtains at the apartments of the wives of the Holy Prophet. According to at least three authors (
Karen Armstrong, Reza Aslan and Leila Ahmed), the stipulations of the hijab were originally meant only for Muhammad’s wives, and were intended to maintain their inviolability. By instituting seclusion Prophet Muhammad, under instructions from his Lord was creating a distance between his wives and the perpetual thronging community on their doorstep.
b) However as the Islamic Jurisprudence developed, the legal experts — fuqahaa — extended this hijab/curtain to mean division of the Muslim space into two i.e. total segregation of sexes.
c)The purpose of the concept of hijaab was to prevent sexual attraction and licentiousness leading to “fitnah” i.e. adultery and fornication.
d) To achieve these objectives:
First, some dress codes are designed; it should be emphasized that the word hijab does not refer to any piece of cloth for women to wear. It refers to a concept and practice to implement the Shari’ah version of Modesty and Decency.
Second, a certain type of behaviour and decorum has been proposed.
All the four schools of thought of Sunni Islam — Hanafi, Maliki, Shafai, Hanbali — are agreed on these
principles and have unanimously designed and advocated a scheme for Islamic Legal Hijaab and the injunctions related to them. Using the format of Maulana Mufti Mohammed Shafi in his classical Tafsir, Ma’aariful Quran the details of Sunni Shari’ah on hijaabare briefly summarised (may sound stupid and arrogant, but much of this beats me):
1) Hijaab of first degree: The real and desired objective of Shariah is Hijaab-ul-Ashkhas i.e. physical hiding of women from strangers. In other words, women and their movements should remain hidden from the sight of men. Allah Ta’aala says “ And stay quietly in your houses”(ayah 33/33) to the wives of the Prophet. Our scholars maintain that “ the verse means to impress that the woman’s real sphere of activity is her home; she should carry out her functions within that sphere peacefully, and she should come out of the house only in case of a genuine need.”[1]
2) Hijaab of second degree: If a woman has dire need to leave her house, she is required to cover her whole body from head to toes with a loose, flowing dress to cover the figure, gyrations and movements of the female body. The recommendation of the scholars include “the women should wrap themselves up well in their sheets, and should draw and let down a part of the sheet in front of the face and an eye, leaving only the other eye uncovered” and “to see their way, one eye can remain exposed or use a patch of net before the eyes” and “that she should walk on the side of the street and avoid the crowd.”
[2]
3) Hijaab of third degree: In this category the face is allowed to be exposed based on the opinion of Imam Abu Hanifa, who declared that face and hands are not part of satarul awrah of woman. However later scholars of the Hanafi school opined that exposing the face can in certain situation lead to fitnah. Hence their recommendations is to cover the face. A, fatwa by Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid of Saudi Arabia states: “The correct view as indicated by the evidence is that the woman’s face is awrah which must be covered. It is the most tempting part of her body, because what people look at most is the face, so the face is the greatest ‘awrah of a woman.” It may be added that the three Imams — Malik, Shafa’i and Ibn Hanbal — held it absolutely impermissible to expose face and palms. For practical purposes therefore, this third degree hijaab stands prohibited by consensus of the four Imams.
4) There are several other proscriptions and prohibitions in the Shari’ah Law of Hijaab:
a) Some jurists have declared that the voice of women is included in satr or awrah . However this issue is debatable in Fiqh.
[3]
b) Women should not wear perfume when they go out, as it is part of their zeenah.
c) Wearing decorated veil when going out is prohibited
d) One source has categorized the requirements of Hijaab as six heads.
[4]
e)The issue of the Niqab has continued to arouse extended controversy and debate between `Ulama (scholars) and Fuqaha(jurists) both past and present concerning whether it is Wajib (mandatory) or Mustahab (favored by Allah) for the woman.
[5]
Despite the consensus of the Four Schools of Sunni Islam on the requirements of hijaab, on the ground, there is a wide spectrum in forms of hijaab seen in the Muslim communities round the world:
The real orthodox and traditional are practicing full segregation and will don the full burqua which includes the face if they have to venture out due to unavoidable circumstances.
The Taliban version adds coercion and cruelty in implementing Hijaab and is sweeping in its interpretation.
There is a diluted version of orthodoxy who are soft on segregation, feel strongly about a full burqua showing only the eyes but feel free, contrary to the orthodox Shariah to go out on streets, bazaars, schools, colleges, offices even pop music concerts and dancing sessions. Some of them have migrated to the West causing issues in some European countries. Incidentally their migration is makrooh if not haram because the West is a very licentious and depraved society according to their value system.
The Saudi Arabian version has an elaborate State system, including a moral police to enforce their idea of Hijaab.
[6]
Iran has it own version of Hijaab with the need for religious police to enforce compliance. After the Islamic revolution, Khomeini publicly announced his disapproval of mixing between the sexes.
The most interesting phenomenon is the twentieth Century Version of Hijaab observed, I guess in last three to four decades. Through a process of metamorphosis a simple and miniaturized version of hijaab has popped up: cover your head and hair with a scarf and that’s it; you are done. Covering rest of the body and the behavior and demeanor may be customised individually; no segregation of sexes; face left uncovered. Hence a wide variety of outfits are observed in practice. Quite presumptuously, the headscarf itself is marketed as “hijaab” which, as pointed out earlier is quite erroneous and misleading. If an Arabic word is preferred, the scarf can more accurately be called a khimar.
As far as I can fathom this modern (and taken for granted in the English speaking Muslim world) version of Hijaab falls far short of the Sunni Shari’ah Law. It does not address the problem of Islamic modesty and morality. Most probably this version of hijaab is based on cultural back ground and/or an inferiority/superiority complex and/or tribal affinities and/or religious self profiling and/or mindless herd mentality and/or geopolitical considerations. Here are a few observations as to why I think so:
(1) This version of hijaab certainly does not have any firm basis in Shari’ah, as enunciated by the consensus of the four school (mazaahib) of Sunni Muslim Islam, wherein overing hair is a small and probably insignificant part of Hijaab. I doubt if orthodox Islamic scholarship supports it. I am sure the Talibaan will prosecute this type of hijaabi woman. It is very unlikely to get by the moral police in Saudi Arabia or Iran.
(2) The ayah 24/31 on “khumur” is frequently coated as basis for this form of hijaab. However this conclusion is most probably based on an incorrect interpretation and incomplete application.
[7]
(3) The practice of covering the hair but leaving the face exposed does not make religious sense, let alone common sense. As far back as the seventh century, one of the eminent Companions Abdullah ibn Umer had the vision to decide that face is part of the zeenah of women which is included in the meaning of the ayah 24/31 “…..except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof….” and therefore face need not be covered. It is on the basis of this opinion that Imam Abu Hanifa decided, that face is not part of the awrahand can be exposed. The other three great Imams want the face to be covered. Should it not be apparent to the educated elite and PPK Muslims that the hair also should be included in the same exception in the twenty-first century as the face.
[8]
(4) A Muslim does not want his sister/wife/daughter to be an object of a meaningful gaze by another man. If the man does it anyhow, who is at fault? It is the woman, it seems because Maulana Mufti Mohammed Shafi, a benchmark for Orthodox opinion declares that woman is the most lethal arsenal in the workshop of the Devil i.e. Shaitaan (as a young man I felt like blurting out to him: your mother may be an agent for the devil; mine is not). Hence the prescription by the authors of the prevailing Islamic Jurisprudence — Fiqh/Shari’ah — to wrap the woman up and put in a box. But this is plan B in Quranic Law reserved to protect women in special and selective adverse circumstances “…. that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested…” ( verse 33/59). As a Primary and General rule for protection of women, the Quranic Law has Plan A which suggests that to save embarrassment to your own women folk, you should stop gazing at the sister/wife/daughter of other men “Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze….”(ayah 24/30). God Almighty has issued exactly similar injunctions to women as well: “And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze…..”(ayah 24/31). No wonder, I love and adore my Deen: gave us golden rules in the seventh century which are valid in the twenty-first, provided we are prepared to think. Woefully a Muslim today drives in the latest limousine guided by “GPS” to his/her office but hops on the camel and rides into the desert to see the moon by naked eye in matters of religion and it’s festivals.
(5) This version of hijaab ignores and misinterprets the essence and purpose of hijaab namely to ensure Islamic standards of modesty and decency in dress and behavior and thereby to avoid fitnah. A teenager with a tight skinny jeans with a short shirt displaying the anatomy and a headscarf on her head is regarded as “hijaabi.” Whereas another, wearing a smart
shalwar kameeswith nothing to reveal and a beautiful hair style will be considered as “non-hijaabi.”
[9]
(6) This form of hijaab has encouraged inconsistencies and contradictions. It is not uncommon to see a mother of three with a head scarf and her teenage girl accompanying her with a lovely hair style; the opposite also is occasionally true. A woman covers her hairs diligently at one place and will show a lovely hair style at another. You can see teenagers proud of their head scarf in one gathering and happily running about wearing jeans, short shirt and fantastic hair style in another.
[10]
(7) The traditional Islamic literature usually frowns upon imitating other religions and Unbelievers (I personally, though do not see any problem wearing Western dress). It is therefore pertinent to note that this truncated version of Hijaab bears very close resemblance to the practice of Christian nuns.
[11]
(8) The why and how of this version of Hijaab remains speculative. I guess and it is only a guess that it has evolved as a symbol of our resistance to the West and as an icon of Muslim identity. This is wrong if not absurd. A Muslim and Muslim Ummah do not need a trademark. The five mandatory prayers and the piety and personality that ought to go with is what defines and identifies a Muslim — man or woman.
[12]
In conclusion, a point for deliberation specially for us, in USA. Trying to meet the demands of Islamic dress code for modesty is probably the greatest cause of pressures and tensions on our delicate teenage daughters. Is asking them to frame their faces with veils on their heads like Christian nuns in the eyes of their peers worth this cost to them? Will it not be better, instead and worth this cost, if we can persuade, encourage and help our sweet smiling girls to avoid and dislike short shirts and fitting jeans and pants in search of Islamic decency?
…..and Allah knows best.
May Allah Ta’aala bless us with true understanding–“fahm”–of our Deen, Aameen.